AMD duron vs AMD sempron.?

how much better is a amd sempron3200 512 ddr2 533 contained by comparison to a amd duron x86 700mhz 228 sdd 3600

AMD duron vs AMD sempron.?

mmm .. if u were converting an avi movie folder to dvd and it took 2 hours to do the job on the sempron .. it would probably pilfer 4 hours on the duron ... but for everyday tasks like surfing the pattern and using word u wouldnt notice alot of difference ..
It's adjectives about Windows!
sempron sucks i hold it
The both the Sempron and Duron are very low surrounded by performance. They be built for the basic features of computing. High-End Durons could compete next to Low-End Semprons. High-End Semprons can not compete with the Highest-End Athlon XP (Dropped for the Athlon 64). The top end Athlon XP is the 3200+ (2.2Ghz 700mhz FSB). But my brother have a Sempron 3500+, it seems to sympathetic Internet Explorer 7 and Firefox alot faster than my old Athlon XP 3200+. Here are the specs: (1) Sempron 3500+ (64Bit) 512mb DDR 160GB HDD GeForce 6200 (2) Athlon XP 3200+ 1GB DDR 200GB HDD Radeon 9800. As you can see the Athlon XP is superior surrounded by equipment. I benchmarked both pcs and the Athlon XP won, by alot. So if it comes to Duron vs. Sempron, it's Sempron. Sempron is still great for non-graphic intensive games, browing the web, watching DVDs, and Office Applications. Plus the Semprons are 64bit. I don't recommend Semprons for Vista (any of them). Windows XP is not easy enough. Hope this help!